Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amaan Stadium
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin close). Pontificalibus (talk) 15:55, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Amaan Stadium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An average soccer stadium in Africa. Fails the general notability guideline and WP:MILL. Interchangeable|talk to me|what I've changed 18:51, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if this stadium were in New York and not Zanzibar, there is no way it would ever considered for deletion. Wikipedia's systematic bias strikes again.--TM 21:30, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - it's a 15,000 person stadium in a major city, not a little league field in the middle of nowhere. The article needs expansion, not deletion. Zachlipton (talk) 02:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep A very quick search on google, google books, and google news turned up coverage on historical events that have happened here. I've added these into the article, although I'm sure there is more to find. There is also some more recent coverage I haven't added yet on debates over its finances, use by the military, and use as a soccer stadium. A president of Zanzibar has been sworn in here. --Banana (talk) 21:41, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 22:46, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as above, this stadium appears to be notable in both a sporting and non-sporting context. GiantSnowman 22:47, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep very notable and sources are cited very well — Preceding unsigned comment added by Czixang gb (talk • contribs) 08:20, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Meets WP:GNG does not come under Mill, although that is just an essay. Adam4267 (talk) 13:56, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notable stadium. Warburton1368 (talk) 21:14, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Many historical events have taken place there. Argyle 4 Lifetalk 21:24, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.